<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lennart Regebro: Plone consulting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://regebro.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://regebro.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Plone is the community!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:25:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Python and time zones part 2: The beast returns! by Bibek Paudel</title>
		<link>http://regebro.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/python-and-time-zones-part-2-the-beast-returns/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>Bibek Paudel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regebro.wordpress.com/?p=92#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>Great one. Thanks for the reasons that i was looking for in my own post at http://bibek.posterous.com/solved-plone-installation-strange-error

Cheers!
Bibek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great one. Thanks for the reasons that i was looking for in my own post at <a href="http://bibek.posterous.com/solved-plone-installation-strange-error" rel="nofollow">http://bibek.posterous.com/solved-plone-installation-strange-error</a></p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Bibek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Kensington Runestone by Lennart Regebro</title>
		<link>http://regebro.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/the-kensington-runestone/#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator>Lennart Regebro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regebro.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-1521</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure who you refer to as &quot;the writer&quot;, but I don&#039;t think the two first change anything. I can however assure you that I definitely have not interpreted it based only on current language without taking into consideration 14th century language. In fact that&#039;s one of my points. The language of the stone is completely modern. It&#039;s not 14th century Scandinavian, it&#039;s 19th century Scandinavian, with English misspellings.

I assume that with &quot;Olag&quot; you mean Olof Öhman, one of the discoverers. You seem to treat him as the only person involved or ever accused of making the stone. In fact several people was involved in finding the stone, including but not restricted to Olof, Olofs son and their Norwegian neighbor Nils Flaten. And then there is of course John P Gran, whose children claim he and Öhman made it. 

You also take up his lack of historical education. But that fit perfectly with the fact that the rune stone completely lacks historical knowledge. It&#039;s an obvious fraud, made by somebody who has very little or no knowledge about 14th century Scandinavian or 14th century runes. The language is 18th century Scandinavian with 18th century runes. This doesn&#039;t mean Olof Öhman made it. But it means that he probably could have made it if he wanted to.

But all that is besides the point. We&#039;ll never prove who made it. The stone is still a very bad fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure who you refer to as &#8220;the writer&#8221;, but I don&#8217;t think the two first change anything. I can however assure you that I definitely have not interpreted it based only on current language without taking into consideration 14th century language. In fact that&#8217;s one of my points. The language of the stone is completely modern. It&#8217;s not 14th century Scandinavian, it&#8217;s 19th century Scandinavian, with English misspellings.</p>
<p>I assume that with &#8220;Olag&#8221; you mean Olof Öhman, one of the discoverers. You seem to treat him as the only person involved or ever accused of making the stone. In fact several people was involved in finding the stone, including but not restricted to Olof, Olofs son and their Norwegian neighbor Nils Flaten. And then there is of course John P Gran, whose children claim he and Öhman made it. </p>
<p>You also take up his lack of historical education. But that fit perfectly with the fact that the rune stone completely lacks historical knowledge. It&#8217;s an obvious fraud, made by somebody who has very little or no knowledge about 14th century Scandinavian or 14th century runes. The language is 18th century Scandinavian with 18th century runes. This doesn&#8217;t mean Olof Öhman made it. But it means that he probably could have made it if he wanted to.</p>
<p>But all that is besides the point. We&#8217;ll never prove who made it. The stone is still a very bad fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Kensington Runestone by Steve Simonson</title>
		<link>http://regebro.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/the-kensington-runestone/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Simonson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regebro.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>There are three primary facts that the writer has ignored.  The first fact is that when the stone was found, they did not allege it was norse, but rather that it possibly was an old Indian tablet.  The second is that Olag never sought to make any fame or fortune from the stone, and rather sold it to a buyer for a very small amount, which would imply that he placed very little value on it (so it would not have been made by him as some prank). Finally, all who have interpreted the text have done so based upon their expertise in &quot;current language&quot; without a full understanding of the dynamics and symantics of the language as it would have existed in the 14th century.  For example, the use of abbreviations, (AV M, for example) which was common in other stone carvings of the period, being used to save time, space and energy in making the stone text (as carving stone is not as easy as writing on paper, or typing on computer).  These facts tend to support the notion thats someone other than Olag would have carved the stone, as he was a farmer with no education on the historical context of the message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are three primary facts that the writer has ignored.  The first fact is that when the stone was found, they did not allege it was norse, but rather that it possibly was an old Indian tablet.  The second is that Olag never sought to make any fame or fortune from the stone, and rather sold it to a buyer for a very small amount, which would imply that he placed very little value on it (so it would not have been made by him as some prank). Finally, all who have interpreted the text have done so based upon their expertise in &#8220;current language&#8221; without a full understanding of the dynamics and symantics of the language as it would have existed in the 14th century.  For example, the use of abbreviations, (AV M, for example) which was common in other stone carvings of the period, being used to save time, space and energy in making the stone text (as carving stone is not as easy as writing on paper, or typing on computer).  These facts tend to support the notion thats someone other than Olag would have carved the stone, as he was a farmer with no education on the historical context of the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu vs OS X: The deathmatch! by Lon Baker</title>
		<link>http://regebro.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/ubuntu-vs-os-x-the-deathmatch/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>Lon Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regebro.wordpress.com/?p=230#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>FYI.

If Doubletwist.com and Ableton Live ran on Ubuntu, I would probably never need to boot Mac OS X again.

Then again, maybe I will fall out of love with Linux. It happens. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI.</p>
<p>If Doubletwist.com and Ableton Live ran on Ubuntu, I would probably never need to boot Mac OS X again.</p>
<p>Then again, maybe I will fall out of love with Linux. It happens. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu vs OS X: The deathmatch! by Lon Baker</title>
		<link>http://regebro.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/ubuntu-vs-os-x-the-deathmatch/#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>Lon Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regebro.wordpress.com/?p=230#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>I am typing this from a brand new 13&quot; Macbook Pro, which is running Ubuntu 9.10 solely - with no Mac OS X partition.

Having been a Mac guy since Photoshop was version 1.0 and Apple made the only laser printer, I am what you call a &quot;mac guy&quot;.

I love their platform, the attention to detail that they currently put into both their software and hardware.

That said, I spend most of my days writing web apps, working with databases and prototyping new services for my business.

I bought Apple hardware so that I have the option of using either of the best operating systems on the planet. Linux or Mac OS X.

I could have paid less for the hardware and gotten a cheap plastic Dell, but then my options would be limited to a great OS (linux) and a crappy one (windows).

I want the best of both worlds. So I got a mac!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am typing this from a brand new 13&#8243; Macbook Pro, which is running Ubuntu 9.10 solely &#8211; with no Mac OS X partition.</p>
<p>Having been a Mac guy since Photoshop was version 1.0 and Apple made the only laser printer, I am what you call a &#8220;mac guy&#8221;.</p>
<p>I love their platform, the attention to detail that they currently put into both their software and hardware.</p>
<p>That said, I spend most of my days writing web apps, working with databases and prototyping new services for my business.</p>
<p>I bought Apple hardware so that I have the option of using either of the best operating systems on the planet. Linux or Mac OS X.</p>
<p>I could have paid less for the hardware and gotten a cheap plastic Dell, but then my options would be limited to a great OS (linux) and a crappy one (windows).</p>
<p>I want the best of both worlds. So I got a mac!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu vs OS X: The deathmatch! by Sid</title>
		<link>http://regebro.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/ubuntu-vs-os-x-the-deathmatch/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regebro.wordpress.com/?p=230#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>3d modeling? Try Blender ... 3d modeling, 3d animator, 3d renderer, and you can make interactive 3d (3d game) ... all for free

About paid support. I&#039;ve used Ubuntu for few years now, never need paid support. I don&#039;t know anyone who does. Paid support is for corporation and big-ish companies.

&quot;Mac Books Pros are great laptops. best design I’ve ever seen&quot;

Agreed. I&#039;m trying to score one on online auction. But most likely will install Ubuntu on it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3d modeling? Try Blender &#8230; 3d modeling, 3d animator, 3d renderer, and you can make interactive 3d (3d game) &#8230; all for free</p>
<p>About paid support. I&#8217;ve used Ubuntu for few years now, never need paid support. I don&#8217;t know anyone who does. Paid support is for corporation and big-ish companies.</p>
<p>&#8220;Mac Books Pros are great laptops. best design I’ve ever seen&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed. I&#8217;m trying to score one on online auction. But most likely will install Ubuntu on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu vs OS X: The deathmatch! by Lennart Regebro</title>
		<link>http://regebro.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/ubuntu-vs-os-x-the-deathmatch/#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator>Lennart Regebro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regebro.wordpress.com/?p=230#comment-1512</guid>
		<description>Yes, how about it? Do you have a point? Or a question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, how about it? Do you have a point? Or a question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu vs OS X: The deathmatch! by Marius</title>
		<link>http://regebro.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/ubuntu-vs-os-x-the-deathmatch/#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regebro.wordpress.com/?p=230#comment-1511</guid>
		<description>How about some 3d modeling in Linux ( like Maya) or how about great programs like Photoshop etc etc that are not available for Linux distros... As the iPhone campaign said &quot;there&#039;s an app for that&quot;! sure that costs money but in the end all costs money. and for that money you get support etc... 

btw did you know that support for Ubuntu Desktop 
- starter support costs £ 34.73 / year
- advanced support costs £ 72.63 / year
- professional support costs £ 138.03 / year
( link for verifications: http://shop.canonical.com/product_info.php?products_id=530 )
so in the end it&#039;s not so cheap after all, but that is for individuals/companies who needs support.

Mac Books Pros are great laptops. best design I&#039;ve ever seen ( tried dell, HP, Toshiba)  great battery life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about some 3d modeling in Linux ( like Maya) or how about great programs like Photoshop etc etc that are not available for Linux distros&#8230; As the iPhone campaign said &#8220;there&#8217;s an app for that&#8221;! sure that costs money but in the end all costs money. and for that money you get support etc&#8230; </p>
<p>btw did you know that support for Ubuntu Desktop<br />
- starter support costs £ 34.73 / year<br />
- advanced support costs £ 72.63 / year<br />
- professional support costs £ 138.03 / year<br />
( link for verifications: <a href="http://shop.canonical.com/product_info.php?products_id=530" rel="nofollow">http://shop.canonical.com/product_info.php?products_id=530</a> )<br />
so in the end it&#8217;s not so cheap after all, but that is for individuals/companies who needs support.</p>
<p>Mac Books Pros are great laptops. best design I&#8217;ve ever seen ( tried dell, HP, Toshiba)  great battery life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Switching to OS X, Obstacle 1: Where the heck is that button? by WJC</title>
		<link>http://regebro.wordpress.com/2008/11/06/switching-to-os-x-obstacle-1-where-the-heck-is-that-button/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>WJC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regebro.wordpress.com/?p=186#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve switched to OS X couple months back too. It&#039;s true that always need to Google on some keyboard shortcuts.

But once used to the common shortcuts like 
Cmd-O to open things up, 
Cmd-W to close window
Cmd-Q to quit whole application

Other than that it is quite a nice experience. One thumbs up feature that I like is the Multi-Touch Trackpad, they have for Macbook. It&#039;s really really convenient for me.

4-fingers swipe UP, Show Desktop, all things hide to corner
4-fingers swipe DOWN, Expose, split up all the windows
4-fingers swipe Left/Right : Application chooser same as Cmd-Tab

2-fingers scrolling is the best of ALL. No longer need the page up/down button, Besides, it could even scroll other application windows while u working on your current window without click over to activate that window. (Good for multiple browser page, doing comparison or other stuff)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve switched to OS X couple months back too. It&#8217;s true that always need to Google on some keyboard shortcuts.</p>
<p>But once used to the common shortcuts like<br />
Cmd-O to open things up,<br />
Cmd-W to close window<br />
Cmd-Q to quit whole application</p>
<p>Other than that it is quite a nice experience. One thumbs up feature that I like is the Multi-Touch Trackpad, they have for Macbook. It&#8217;s really really convenient for me.</p>
<p>4-fingers swipe UP, Show Desktop, all things hide to corner<br />
4-fingers swipe DOWN, Expose, split up all the windows<br />
4-fingers swipe Left/Right : Application chooser same as Cmd-Tab</p>
<p>2-fingers scrolling is the best of ALL. No longer need the page up/down button, Besides, it could even scroll other application windows while u working on your current window without click over to activate that window. (Good for multiple browser page, doing comparison or other stuff)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Setuptools on Python 3: Work on hold. by Python 3.1.1 + Distribute + Mod_WSGI Available For RHEL/CentOS 5 &#171; IUS Community Project</title>
		<link>http://regebro.wordpress.com/2009/04/21/setuptools-on-python-3-work-on-hold/#comment-1508</link>
		<dc:creator>Python 3.1.1 + Distribute + Mod_WSGI Available For RHEL/CentOS 5 &#171; IUS Community Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://regebro.wordpress.com/?p=410#comment-1508</guid>
		<description>[...] is a well known fact that Setup Tools is not Python 3 compatible, and there is heavy debate over whether it ever will be.  Because of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a well known fact that Setup Tools is not Python 3 compatible, and there is heavy debate over whether it ever will be.  Because of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
